Risk Analysis Index as a preoperative frailty tool for elective ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) predominantly occurs in older patients, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is the definitive surgical treatment. VPS surgery carries significant postoperative complication rates, which may tip the risk/benefit balance of this treatment option for frail, or higher-risk, patients. In this study, the authors investigated the use of frailty scoring for preoperative risk stratification for adverse event prediction in iNPH patients who underwent elective VPS placement. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried from 2018 to 2019 for iNPH patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent VPS surgery. Risk Analysis Index (RAI) and modified 5-item Frailty Index (mFI-5) scores were calculated and RAI cross-tabulation was used to analyze trends in frailty scores by the following binary outcome measures: overall complications, nonhome discharge (NHD), extended length of stay (eLOS) (> 75th percentile), and mortality. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the discriminatory accuracy of RAI and mFI-5 for primary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 9319 iNPH patients underwent VPS surgery, and there were 685 readmissions (7.4%), 593 perioperative complications (6.4%), and 94 deaths (1.0%). Increasing RAI score was significantly associated with increasing rates of postoperative complications: RAI scores 11-15, 5.4% (n = 80); 16-20, 5.6% (n = 291); 21-25, 7.6% (n = 166); and ≥ 26, 11.6% (n = 56). The discriminatory accuracy of RAI was statistically superior (DeLong test, p < 0.05) to mFI-5 for the primary endpoints of mortality, NHD, and eLOS. All RAI C-statistics were > 0.60 for mortality within 30 days (C-statistic = 0.69, 95% CI 0.68-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide database analysis, increasing frailty, as measured by RAI, was associated with NHD, 30-day mortality, unplanned readmission, eLOS, and postoperative complications. Although the RAI outperformed the mFI-5, it is essential to account for the potentially reversible clinical issues related to the underlying disease process, as these factors may inflate frailty scores, assign undue risk, and diminish their utility. This knowledge may enhance provider understanding of the impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes for patients with iNPH, while highlighting the potential constraints associated with frailty assessment tools.

Risk Analysis Index and 30-Day Mortality after Brain Tumor Resection: A Multicenter Frailty Analysis of 31,776 Patients from 2012 to 2020.

Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the discriminative accuracy of the preoperative Risk Analysis Index (RAI) frailty score for prediction of mortality or transition to hospice within 30 days of brain tumor resection (BTR) in a large multicenter, international, prospective database. Methods Records of BTR patients were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2012-2020) database. The relationship between the RAI frailty scale and the primary end point (mortality or discharge to hospice within 30 days of surgery) was assessed using linear-by-linear proportional trend tests, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the curve as C-statistic). Results Patients with BTR ( N = 31,776) were stratified by RAI frailty tier: 16,800 robust (52.8%), 7,646 normal (24.1%), 6,593 frail (20.7%), and 737 severely frail (2.3%). The mortality/hospice rate was 2.5% ( n = 803) and was positively associated with increasing RAI tier: robust (0.9%), normal (3.3%), frail (4.6%), and severely frail (14.2%) ( p < 0.001). Isolated RAI was a robust discriminatory of primary end point in ROC curve analysis in the overall BTR cohort (C-statistic: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.76) as well as the malignant (C-statistic: 0.74; 95% CI: 0. 67-0.80) and benign (C-statistic: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.70-0.73) tumor subsets (all p < 0.001). RAI score had statistically significantly better performance compared with the 5-factor modified frailty index and chronological age (both p < 0.0001). Conclusions RAI frailty score predicts 30-day mortality after BTR and may be translated to the bedside with a user-friendly calculator ( https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/braintumormortalityRAIcalc/ ). The findings hope to augment the informed consent and surgical decision-making process in this patient population and provide an example for future study designs.

Microsurgical Resection of Brainstem Cavernous Malformations in Older Adults: A Multicenter, 30-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Microsurgical resection is the only curative intervention for symptomatic brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs), but the management of these lesions in older adults (≥65 years) is not well described. This study sought to address this gap by examining the safety and efficacy of BSCM resection in a cohort of older adults. METHODS: Records of patients who underwent BSCM resection over a 30-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients. RESULTS: Of 550 patients with BSCM who met inclusion criteria, 41 (7.5%) were older than 65 years. Midbrain (43.9% vs 26.1%) and medullary lesions (19.5% vs 13.6%) were more common in the older cohort than in the younger cohort (P = .01). Components of the Lawton BSCM grading system (ie, lesion size, crossing axial midpoint, developmental venous anomaly, and timing of hemorrhage) were not significantly different between cohorts (P ≥ .11). Mean (SD) Elixhauser comorbidity score was significantly higher in older patients (1.86 [1.06]) than in younger patients (0.66 [0.95]; P < .001). Older patients were significantly more likely than younger patients to have poor outcomes at final follow-up (28.9% vs 13.8%, P = .01; mean follow-up duration, 28.7 [39.1] months). However, regarding relative neurological outcome (preoperative modified Rankin Scale to final modified Rankin Scale), rate of worsening was not significantly different between older and younger patients (23.7% vs 14.9%, P = .15). CONCLUSION: BSCMs can be safely resected in older patients, and when each patient's unique health status and life expectancy are taken into account, these patients can have outcomes similar to younger patients.

Modafinil Therapy and Mental Status Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Comprehensive Stroke Center Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Disorders of consciousness impair early recovery after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Modafinil, a wakefulness-promoting agent, is efficacious for treating fatigue in stroke survivors, but data pertaining to its use in the acute setting are scarce. This study sought to assess the effects of modafinil use on mental status after aSAH. METHODS: Modafinil timing and dosage, neurological examination, intubation status, and physical and occupational therapy participation were documented. Repeated-measures paired tests were used for a before-after analysis of modafinil recipients. Propensity score matching (1:1 nearest neighbor) for modafinil and no-modafinil cohorts was used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Modafinil (100-200 mg/day) was administered to 21% (88/422) of aSAH patients for a median (IQR) duration of 10.5 (4-16) days and initiated 14 (7-17) days after aSAH. Improvement in mentation (alertness, orientation, or Glasgow Coma Scale score) was documented in 87.5% (77/88) of modafinil recipients within 72 hours and 86.4% (76/88) at discharge. Of 37 intubated patients, 10 (27%) were extubated within 72 hours after modafinil initiation. Physical and occupational therapy teams noted increased alertness or participation in 47 of 56 modafinil patients (83.9%). After propensity score matching for baseline covariates, the modafinil cohort had a greater mean (SD) change in Glasgow Coma Scale score than the no-modafinil cohort at discharge (2.2 [4.0] vs. -0.2 [6.32], P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A temporal relationship with improvement in mental status was noted for most patients administered modafinil after aSAH. These findings, a favorable adverse-effect profile, and implications for goals-of-care decisions favor a low threshold for modafinil initiation in aSAH patients in the acute-care setting.

The risk analysis index demonstrates superior discriminative ability in predicting extended length of stay in pituitary adenoma resection patients when compared to the 5-point modified frailty index.

Objective: To compare the predictive abilities of two frailty indices on post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pituitary adenoma resection. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to retrospectively collect data for patients undergoing pituitary adenoma resection between 2015-2019. To compare the predictive abilities of two of the most common frailty indices, the 5-point modified frailty index (mFI-5) and the risk analysis index (RAI), receiver operating curve analysis (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC)/Cstatistic were used. Results: In our cohort of 1,454 patients, the RAI demonstrated superior discriminative ability to the mFI-5 in predicting extended length of stay (C-statistic 0.59, 95% CI 0.56-0.62 vs. C-statistic 0.51, 95% CI: 0.48-0.54, p = 0.0002). The RAI only descriptively appeared superior to mFI-5 in determining mortality (C-statistic 0.89, 95% CI 0.74-0.99 vs. Cstatistic 0.63, 95% CI 0.61-0.66, p=0.11), and NHD (C-statistic 0.68, 95% CI 0.60-0.76 vs. C-statistic 0.60, 95% CI: 0.57-0.62, p=0.15). Conclusions: Pituitary adenomas account for one of the most common brain tumors in the general population, with resection being the preferred treatment for patients with most hormone producing tumors or those causing compressive symptoms. Although pituitary adenoma resection is generally safe, patients who experience post-operative complications frequently share similar pre-operative characteristics and comorbidities. Therefore, appropriate pre-operative risk stratification is imperative for adequate patient counseling and informed consent in these patients. Here we present the first known report showing the superior discriminatory ability of the RAI in predicting eLOS when compared to the mFI-5.

The Limited Utility of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score as a Frailty Assessment Tool in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is an International Classification of Disease 10th Revision-based scale that was originally designed for, and validated in, the assessment of patients 75 years or older presenting in an acute care setting. This study highlights central tenets inherent to the concept of frailty; questions the logic behind, and utility of, HFRS' recent implementation in the neurosurgical literature; and discusses why there is no useful role for HFRS as a frailty-based neurosurgical risk assessment (FBNRA) tool. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review of the literature per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, including all cranial and spinal studies that used HFRS as their primary frailty tool. Seventeen (N = 17) studies used HFRS to assess frailty's impact on neurosurgical outcomes. Thirteen total journals, 10 of which were neurosurgical journals, including the highest impact factor journals, published the 17 papers. RESULTS: Increasing HFRS score was associated with adverse outcomes, including prolonged length of stay (11 of 17 studies), nonroutine discharge (10 of 17 studies), and increased hospital costs (9 of 17 studies). Four different HFRS studies, of the 17, predicted one of the following 4 adverse outcomes: worse quality of life, worse functional outcomes, reoperation, or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite its rapid acceptance and widespread proliferation through the leading neurosurgical journals, HFRS lacks any conceptual relationship to the frailty syndrome or FBNRA for individual patients. HFRS measures acute conditions using International Classification of Disease 10th Revision codes and awards "frailty" points for symptoms and examination findings unrelated to the impaired baseline physiological reserve inherent to the very definition of frailty. HFRS lacks clinical utility as it cannot be deployed point-of-care at the bedside to risk stratify patients. HFRS has never been validated in any patient population younger than 75 years or in any nonacute care setting. We recommend HFRS be discontinued as an individual FBNRA tool.

A Review of Preoperative Embolization Effectiveness in Patients With Arteriovenous Malformations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains controversial. This study sought to analyze the cost-effectiveness of preoperative embolization of AVMs. METHODS: Patients who underwent AVM resection at a single institute (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2020) were analyzed. Patients with preoperative embolization (embolization cohort) were compared with those without preoperative embolization (nonembolization cohort). Cost-effectiveness score (CE) was the primary outcome of interest and was determined by dividing the total 1-year cost by effectiveness, which was derived from a validated preoperative to last follow-up change in the modified Rankin Scale utility score. A lower CE signifies a more cost-effective treatment strategy. RESULTS: Of 188 patients, 88 (47%) underwent preoperative embolization. The mean (SD) total cost was higher in the embolization group than in the nonembolization group ($117 594 [$102 295] vs $84 348 [$82 326]; P < .001). The mean (SD) CE was higher in the embolization cohort ($336 476 [$1 303 842]) than in the nonembolization cohort ($100 237 [$246 255]; P < .001). Among patients with Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade I and II AVMs, the mean (SD) CE was higher in the embolization (n = 40) than in the nonembolization (n = 72) cohort ($164 950 [$348 286] vs $69 021 [$114 938]; P = .004). Among patients with SM grade III AVMs, the mean (SD) CE was lower in the embolization (n = 33) than in the nonembolization (n = 25) cohort ($151 577 [$219 130] vs $189 195 [$446 335]; P = .006). The mean (SD) CE was not significantly different between cohorts among patients with higher-grade AVMs (embolization cohort [n = 3] vs nonembolization cohort [n = 15]: $503 639 [$776 492] vs $2 048 419 [$4 794 758]; P = .49). The mean CE for embolized SM grade III aneurysms was nonsignificant in the ruptured group; however, for the unruptured group, CE was significantly higher in the embolization cohort (n = 26; $160 871 [$240 535]) relative to the nonembolization cohort (n = 15; $108 152 [$166 446]) ( P = .006). CONCLUSION: Preoperative embolization was cost-effective for patients with SM grade III AVMs but not for patients with lower-grade AVMs.

The frailty-driven predictive model for failure to rescue among patients who experienced a major complication following cervical decompression and fusion: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of 3,632 cases (2011-2020).

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Preoperative risk stratification for patients considering cervical decompression and fusion (CDF) relies on established independent risk factors to predict the probability of complications and outcomes in order to help guide pre and perioperative decision-making. PURPOSE: This study aims to determine frailty's impact on failure to rescue (FTR), or when a mortality occurs within 30 days following a major complication. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of retrospective and nationally-representative data. PATIENT SAMPLE: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for all CDF cases from 2011-2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: CDF patients who experienced a major complication were identified and FTR was calculated as death or hospice disposition within 30 days of a major complication. METHODS: Frailty was measured by the Risk Analysis Index-Revised (RAI-Rev). Baseline patient demographics and characteristics were compared for all FTR patients. Significant factors were assessed by univariate and multivariable regression for the development of a frailty-driven predictive model for FTR. The discriminative ability of the predictive model was assessed using a receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: There were 3632 CDF patients who suffered a major complication and 7.6% (277 patients) subsequently expired or dispositioned to hospice, the definition of FTR. Independent predictors of FTR were nonelective surgery, frailty, preoperative intubation, thrombosis or embolic complication, unplanned intubation, on ventilator for >48 hours, cardiac arrest, and septic shock. Frailty, and a combination of preoperative and postoperative risk factors in a predictive model for FTR, achieved outstanding discriminatory accuracy (C-statistic = 0.901, CI: 0.883-0.919). CONCLUSION: Preoperative and postoperative risk factors, combined with frailty, yield a highly accurate predictive model for FTR in CDF patients. Our model may guide surgical management and/or prognostication regarding the likelihood of FTR after a major complication postoperatively with CDF patients. Future studies may determine the predictive ability of this model in other neurosurgical patient populations.

A taxonomy for deep cerebral cavernous malformations: subtypes of basal ganglia lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Anatomical taxonomy is a practical tool that has successfully guided clinical decision-making for patients with brain arteriovenous malformations and brainstem cavernous malformations (CMs). Deep CMs are similarly complex lesions that are difficult to access and highly variable in size, shape, and position. The authors propose a novel taxonomy for deep CMs in the basal ganglia based on clinical presentation (syndromes) and anatomical location. METHODS: The taxonomy system was developed and applied to an extensive 2-surgeon experience over 19 years (2001-2019). Lesions involving the basal ganglia were identified and subtyped on the basis of the predominant superficial presentation identified on preoperative MRI. Three subtypes of basal ganglia CMs were defined: caudate (31, 57%), putaminal (16, 30%), and pallidal (7, 13%). Neurological outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Postoperative mRS scores ≤ 2 were defined as a favorable outcome, and scores > 2 were defined as a poor outcome. Clinical and surgical characteristics and neurological outcomes were compared among subtypes. RESULTS: Fifty-four basal ganglia lesions were identified in 54 patients. Each basal ganglia CM subtype was associated with a recognizable constellation of neurological symptoms. The most common symptoms at presentation were severe or worsening headaches (25, 43%), mild hemiparesis (13, 24%), seizures (7, 13%), and dysmetria or ataxia (6, 11%). Patients with caudate CMs were the most likely to present with headaches and constitutional symptoms. Patients with putaminal CMs were the most likely to present with hemibody sensory deficits and dysmetria or ataxia. Patients with pallidal CMs were the most likely to present with mild hemiparesis and visual field deficits. A single surgical approach was preferred (> 80% of cases) for each basal ganglia subtype: caudate (contralateral transcallosal-transventricular, 28/31, 90%), putaminal (transsylvian-anterior transinsular, 13/16, 81%), and pallidal (transsylvian supracarotid-infrafrontal, 7/7, 100%). Most patients with follow-up had stable or improved mRS scores postoperatively (94%, 44/47); mRS scores of > 2 at final follow-up did not differ among the 3 basal ganglia subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the authors' hypothesis that this taxonomy for basal ganglia CMs meaningfully guides the selection of surgical approach and resection strategy. Furthermore, the proposed taxonomy can increase the diagnostic acumen at the patient bedside, help identify optimal surgical approaches, enhance the consistency of clinical communications and publications, and improve patient outcomes.

Gender concordance and publication productivity within Neurosurgical Focus: a 10-year review (2013-2022).

OBJECTIVE: The "leaky academic pipeline" describes how female representation in leadership positions has remained stagnant despite an increase in the number of female trainees. Female mentorship to female mentees, and female role models at higher academic positions have been shown to positively influence academic productivity. To the authors' knowledge, the impact of female editorial board representation on authorship trends in neurosurgical journals remains undescribed. This study aimed to analyze trends in the representation of female topic editors and its impact on female authorship within Neurosurgical Focus over a 10-year period. METHODS: Publicly available data were collected from the journal's website, inclusive from January 2013 to December 2022. The articles were grouped into technical and nontechnical themes based on their relevance to specific technical details regarding surgical techniques. Female gender-concordant publications were defined as publications having a female first author (or co-first author) and a female senior author. Linear regression analysis determined trends in publishing. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated using logistic regression analysis. Pearson correlation and cross-correlation analyses were used to examine each pairwise comparison of time series. The statistical significance of associations was evaluated using t-tests and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The number of female topic editors and gender-concordant authors increased over time (p < 0.05). Women accounted for ≥ 50% of the topic editors on nontechnical themes relevant to education and gender diversity. Having a female senior author was associated with higher publication productivity for original research and review articles among female authors (OR 13.73, 95% CI 1.75-394.31; p < 0.05). Female authors had higher odds of publishing editorials with a female topic editor (OR 3.81, 95% CI 1.37-11.02; p < 0.01). Publications with female first and senior authors were significantly more likely to have female topic editors (OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.38-12.92; p < 0.01). A positive association was observed between female senior authors and female topic editors at lag -8, with a correlation coefficient of 0.19 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Female attending-to-female trainee mentorship and female representation among editorial boards play a crucial role in enhancing academic productivity among women. Efforts to sustain academic productivity during the early-career period would presumably help increase female representation in neurosurgery.

The anatomy of the four streams of the prefrontal cortex. Preliminary evidence from a population based high definition tractography study.

The model of the four streams of the prefrontal cortex proposes 4 streams of information: motor through Brodmann area (BA) 8, emotion through BA 9, memory through BA 10, and emotional-related sensory through BA 11. Although there is a surge of functional data supporting these 4 streams within the PFC, the structural connectivity underlying these neural networks has not been fully clarified. Here we perform population-based high-definition tractography using an averaged template generated from data of 1,065 human healthy subjects acquired from the Human Connectome Project to further elucidate the structural organization of these regions. We report the structural connectivity of BA 8 with BA 6, BA 9 with the insula, BA 10 with the hippocampus, BA 11 with the temporal pole, and BA 11 with the amygdala. The 4 streams of the prefrontal cortex are subserved by a structural neural network encompassing fibers of the anterior part of the superior longitudinal fasciculus-I and II, corona radiata, cingulum, frontal aslant tract, and uncinate fasciculus. The identified neural network of the four streams of the PFC will allow the comprehensive analysis of these networks in normal and pathological brain function.

Frailty as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in neurosurgery: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Baseline frailty status has been utilized to predict a wide range of outcomes and guide preoperative decision making in neurosurgery. This systematic review aims to analyze existing literature on the utilization of frailty as a predictor of neurosurgical outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that utilized baseline frailty status to predict outcomes after a neurosurgical intervention were included in this systematic review. Studies that utilized sarcopenia as the sole measure of frailty were excluded. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was searched from inception to March 1st, 2023, to identify relevant articles. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, 244 studies met the inclusion criteria. The 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11) was the most utilized frailty measure (N.=91, 37.2%) followed by the five-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) (N.=80, 32.7%). Spine surgery was the most common subspecialty (N.=131, 53.7%), followed by intracranial tumor resection (N.=57, 23.3%), and post-operative complications were the most reported outcome (N.=130, 53.2%) in neurosurgical frailty studies. The USA and the Bowers author group published the greatest number of articles within the study period (N.=176, 72.1% and N.=37, 15.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty literature has grown exponentially over the years and has been incorporated into neurosurgical decision making. Although a wide range of frailty indices exist, their utility may vary according to their ability to be incorporated in the outpatient clinical setting.

Failure to rescue as a patient safety indicator for neurosurgical patients: are we there yet? A systematic review.

Failure to rescue (FTR) is a standardized patient safety indicator (PSI-04) developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to assess the ability of a healthcare team to prevent mortality following a major complication. However, FTR rates vary and are impacted by non-modifiable individual patient characteristics such as baseline frailty. This raises concerns regarding the validity of FTR as an objective quality metric, as not all patients have the same baseline frailty level, or physiological reserve, to recover from major complications. Literature from other surgical specialties has identified flaws in FTR and called for risk-adjusted metrics. Currently, knowledge of factors influencing FTR and its subsequent implementation in neurosurgical patients are limited. The present review assesses trends in FTR utilization to assess how FTR performs as an objective neurosurgery quality metric. This review then proposes how FTR may be best modified to optimize use in neurosurgical patients. A PubMed search was performed to identify articles published until August 9, 2023. Studies that reported FTR as an outcome in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures were included. A qualitative assessment was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). The initial search revealed 1232 citations. After a title and abstract screen, followed by a full text screen, 12 studies met criteria for inclusion. These articles measured FTR across a total of 764,349 patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Five studies analyzed FTR with regard to hospital characteristics, and three studies utilized patient characteristics to predict FTR. All studies were considered high quality based on the NOS. Modifications in criteria to measure FTR are necessary since FTR depends on patient characteristics like frailty. This would allow for the incorporation of risk-adjusted FTR metrics that would aid in clinical decision making in neurosurgical patients.

Baseline labs predict adverse postoperative outcomes following metastatic brain tumor resection: Analysis of 5943 patients from a prospective surgical registry (2015-2019).

INTRODUCTION: The present study sought to evaluate the predictive accuracy of preoperative lab values (PLV) on postoperative metastatic brain tumor resection (MBTR) outcomes using data queried from a large prospective international surgical registry, representing over 700 hospitals in 11 countries. METHODS: Adult metastatic brain tumor patients (N = 5943) were queried from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database, from 2015 to 2019, using diagnostic and procedural coding. The relationship between preoperative lab values and key indicators of adverse postoperative outcomes following metastatic brain tumor resection were assessed with univariate and multivariate analyses. Adverse postoperative outcomes of interest included: 30-day mortality, Clavien-Dindo Grade IV (CDIV) complications, extended length of stay (eLOS), and discharge to non-home destination (NHD), as well as secondary outcomes: non-Clavien-Dindo Grade IV complications, unplanned reoperation, and unplanned readmission. RESULTS: Independent PLV most strongly associated with 30-day mortality were hypernatremia, increased serum creatinine, and thrombocytopenia. Significant predictors of CDIV complications were hypoalbuminemia and thrombocytopenia. eLOS was associated with hypoalbuminemia, anemia, and hyponatremia. The strongest independent predictors of NHD were anemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and hypoalbuminemia. CONCLUSION: Several pre-operative lab values independently predicted worse outcomes for metastatic brain tumor resection patients. Hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia had the strongest association with the study's adverse postoperative outcomes. These baseline lab values may be considered for preoperative risk stratification of metastatic brain tumor patients.

Radiation-Induced Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: A Single-Center Experience and Systematic Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: Radiation was first demonstrated to be associated with cavernomagenesis in 1992. Since then, a growing body of literature has shown the unique course and presentation of radiation-induced cavernous malformations (RICMs). This study summarizes the literature on RICMs and presents a single-center experience. METHODS: A prospectively maintained single institution vascular malformation database was searched for all cases of intracranial cavernous malformation (January 1, 1997-December 31, 2021). For patients with a diagnosis of RICM, information on demographic characteristics, surgical treatments, radiation, and surgical outcomes was obtained and analyzed. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for all reported cases of RICM. RESULTS: A retrospective review of 1662 patients treated at a single institution yielded 10 patients with prior radiation treatment in the neck or head region and a subsequent diagnosis of intracranial RICM. The median (interquartile range) latency between radiation and presentation was 144 (108-192) months. Nine of 10 patients underwent surgery; symptoms improved for 5 patients, worsened for 3, and were stable for 1. The systematic literature review yielded 64 publications describing 248 patients with RICMs. Of the 248 literature review cases, 71 (28.6%) involved surgical resection. Of 39 patients with reported surgical outcomes, 32 (82%) experienced improvement. CONCLUSIONS: RICMs have a unique course and epidemiology. RICMs should be considered when patients with a history of radiation present with neurologic impairment. When RICMs are identified, symptomatic patients can be treated effectively with surgical excision and close follow-up.

Baseline Frailty and Discharge to Advanced Care Facilities in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Multicenter Registry Analysis of 7153 Patient Cases Comparing the Risk Analysis Index to the 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of frailty, as measured by the 5-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) and the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), on advanced care facility discharge (FD) in patients who underwent lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative spine disease. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2012-2020) was queried for adults (≥18 years) undergoing lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative disease. Descriptive statistics and univariate crosstabulation were used to assess baseline demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the discriminative threshold of the mFI-5 and RAI on FD within this population. RESULTS: The median patient age in this study cohort (N = 7153) was 56 years and FD occurred in 7.3% of cases. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that both the mFI-5 and the RAI accurately predicted FD (C-statistics: mFI-5: 0.627; RAI: 0.746). DeLong's test found that the RAI had superior discrimination when compared to the mFI-5 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RAI is a reliable predictor of FD in lumbar degenerative disease patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion and demonstrated superior discrimination compared to the mFI-5. Identification of patients at risk for FD may facilitate more precise risk stratification to enable better preoperative decision-making and help set more realistic expectations of care.

Causes and Predictors of Unplanned Readmission in Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumor Resection: A Multicenter Analysis of 31,776 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although unplanned readmission is a postoperative outcome metric associated with significant morbidity and financial burden, precise assessment tools for its prediction have not yet been developed. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) could potentially be used to help improve the prediction of unplanned readmissions for patients undergoing intracranial tumor resection (ITR). In the present study, we evaluate the predictive accuracy of frailty on 30-day unplanned readmission after ITR using the RAI. METHODS: Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The baseline characteristics, preoperative clinical status, and outcomes were compared between patients with and without unplanned readmission. Frailty was calculated using the RAI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent associations between unplanned readmissions and patient characteristics. RESULTS: The unplanned readmission rate for this cohort (n = 31,776) was 10.8% (n = 3420). Of the 3420 readmitted patients, 958 required unplanned reoperation. Multiple characteristics were significantly different between the 2 groups, including age, body mass index, comorbidities, and RAI groups (P < 0.05). The common causes of unplanned readmission included infection (9.4%), seizures (6%), and pulmonary embolism (4%). The patient characteristics identified as reliable predictors of unplanned readmission included age, body mass index, functional status, diabetes, hypertension, hyponatremia, and the patient's RAI score (P < 0.05). Frail status, hyponatremia, leukocytosis, hypertension, and thrombocytosis were significant predictors of unplanned readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: The RAI is a reliable preoperative frailty index for predicting unplanned readmissions after ITR. Using the RAI could decrease unplanned readmissions by identifying high-risk patients and enabling future implementation of appropriate management guidelines.

Preoperative frailty and 30-day mortality after resection of brain metastases: a multicenter surgical registry analysis of 11,038 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Surgery plays a key role in the management of brain metastases. Stratifying surgical risk and individualizing treatment will help optimize outcomes because there is clinical equipoise between radiation and resection as treatment options for many patients. Here, the authors used a multicenter database to assess the prognostic utility of baseline frailty, calculated with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), for prediction of mortality within 30 days after surgery for brain metastasis. METHODS: The authors pooled patients who had been surgically treated for brain metastasis from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2012-2020). The authors studied the relationship between preoperative calculated RAI score and 30-day mortality after surgery for brain metastasis by using linear-by-linear proportional trend tests and binary logistic regression. The authors calculated C-statistics (with 95% CIs) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess discriminative accuracy. RESULTS: The authors identified 11,038 patients who underwent brain metastasis resection with a median (interquartile range) age of 62 (54-69) years. The authors categorized patients into four groups on the basis of RAI: robust (RAI 0-20), 8.1% of patients; normal (RAI 21-30), 9.2%; frail (RAI 31-40), 75%; and severely frail (RAI ≥ 41), 8.1%. The authors found a positive correlation between 30-day mortality and frailty. RAI demonstrated superior predictive discrimination for 30-day mortality as compared with the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) on ROC analysis (C-statistic 0.65, 95% CI 0.65-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: The RAI frailty score accurately estimates 30-day mortality after brain metastasis resection and can be calculated online with an open-access software tool: https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/BrainMetsResection/. Accordingly, RAI can be utilized to measure surgical risk, guide treatment options, and optimize outcomes for patients with brain metastases. RAI has superior discrimination for predicting 30-day mortality compared with mFI-5.

Frailty Indexes in Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Quantification of preoperative frailty is an important prognostic tool in neurosurgical decision making. Metastatic spine tumor patients undergoing surgery are frail and have unfavorable outcomes that include an increased length of stay, unfavorable discharge disposition, and increased readmission rates. These undesirable outcomes result in higher treatment costs. A heterogeneous mixture of various frailty indexes is available with marked variance in their validation, leading to disparate clinical utility. The lack of a universally accepted definition for frailty, let alone in the method of creation or elements required in the formation of a frailty index, has resulted in a body of frailty literature lacking precision for predicting neurosurgical outcomes. In this review, we examine the role of reported frailty indexes in predicting postoperative outcomes after resection of metastatic spine tumors and aim to assist as a frailty guide for helping clinical decision making.